North Carolina Senate candidate Greg Brannon (R) is hoping to follow in the steps of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) — and wants to make sure everyone knows.
Brannon, who’s challenging North Carolina House Speaker Thom TillisThom R. TillisRepublicans root for Pence as VP Texas Republicans pushing death penalty bill for cop killers GOP senators blast Ginsburg comments about Trump MORE (R) and others for the GOP nomination to face Sen. Kay HaganKay HaganDemocratic National Convention event calendar 10 Senate seats most likely to flip in 2016 Senate Republicans are feeling the 'Trump effect' MORE (D-N.C.), was in Washington last Friday for an afternoon fundraiser with Paul at the Conservative Political Action Conference. The libertarian-leaning hopeful repeatedly touted Paul’s backing and detailed why he’s the heir to the senator’s libertarian mantle.
The fast-talking Brannon was at the three-day conservative confab with his wife and campaign manager wearing a “Stand with Rand” sticker. Talking to The Hill, he repeatedly slammed the federal government and called for phasing out a number of major government programs and laws. He said he’d prepped for years to run for office by reading the Constitution, not by talking with political consultants.
“I’m a surgeon. I want to be prepared before I do things. The last seven years I’ve read every convention note from 1787-1789,” said Brannon. “Our Founders did not go to war, pledge their life, their fortune, and their honor so the federal government could tell you about ObamaCare, Common Core, light bulbs, water in your toilets. We must understand what freedom and liberty is about.”
Polls show Hagan could be in trouble. But the primary election remains muddled — recent polling has found Tillis ahead in the race, but he’s hovered around 20 percent, with Brannon and three other candidates in the high single or low double digits. If no candidate reaches 40 percent of the vote in the May 6 contest, that spurs a July runoff.
Brannon disputed the notion that only Tillis could win the race, touting his support from Paul and FreedomWorks as well as last week’s endorsement from Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), while pointing to Karl Rove’s fundraising on Tillis’s behalf.
“The rock stars of our party are Sen. Lee, Sen. [Ted] Cruz [R-Texas], Sen. Paul. ... Moderates lose in larger elections,” he said. “The Karl Rove establishment machine versus the Lee, the Paul, the Cruz-type candidate, that’s our debate and our battle of who we are. Are we the party of Reagan, of Coolidge, of Goldwater, of Taft, or are we the party of progressive lite?” he said.
He also disputed that recent legal troubles could hurt his campaign. A court recently ruled that Brannon misled two people into investing in a tech company he helped launch, but he’s appealing the decision.
“It’s not a fair charge at all. I cannot wait for the appeal process. I know the details, I can’t wait until they all come out. I will never sell my handshake. My word, my integrity, is unmovable, and I will be vindicated at the end of the day,” he said.
Brannon demurred when asked to explain his side, saying because of the appeals process “legally I can’t bring things out.”
Brannon’s Tea Party views include opposition to a minimum wage. He also questioned whether the federal government should be involved with food stamps, Social Security, Medicaid or Medicare.
He also cautioned that the government had to fulfill its current obligations on a number of programs, but suggested phasing them out in the long term.
“I would get it towards a local program, no doubt about it,” he said when asked about whether the federal food stamp program should continue. “At this point we cannot stop it tomorrow, it cannot be — as a surgeon, there’s a triaging point. But I ask the question: What helps the individual, a centralized government or a decentralized government? And the answer is clearly a decentralized government.”
On Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, Brannon said it was important to “pay our obligations. It’s crucial that the obligation of that money there, be there to finish the program.”
He also said that he strongly opposed abortion except in cases where the mother’s life is at risk.
“Believe, err on life all of the time. I believe life begins at conception,” he said. “With the mommy’s life? That’s actually ethical. But we should support life and health all the way through. I believe we have to always err on life.”