The retiring lawmaker acted as Mandel's opponent, Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod BrownLame duck TPP vote could be disastrous for Dems—and America The Trail 2016: Her big night Kaine as Clinton's VP pick sells out progressive wing of party MORE (D-Ohio), in debate prep, and he said that's when he realized there was a problem.
"We got to a question on Asian Carp, and his answer was, 'It is Barack ObamaBarack ObamaTrump brings mothers of children killed by undocumented immigrants on stage Is Hillary the perfect female politician? The moral origins of Donald Trump’s rise to power Part One MORE's fault that we have the Asian Carp problem,' " LaTourette told the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
Mandel challenged Brown in one of the nation's most expensive contests, and lost by 5 percentage points.
The influx of outside money brought condemnation from Democrats, and Brown's campaign often cited a $30 million figure in spending from outside GOP groups to take him down. LaTourette acknowledged that Mandel's loss was "not a question of money," because "Josh Mandel had more money than God," he said.
The Senate candidates in Ohio were largely dependent upon the top of their ticket, and if Mitt Romney had been able to pull out a win there, Mandel might've found himself at orientation sessions last week.
But he also made a number of missteps — earning himself the "Pants on Fire" crown for the number of statements he made that were deemed false by the Cleveland Plain Dealer — that didn't boost his chances.
LaTourette acknowledged that Mandel would've had to outrun Romney in the state, and said that "he had been told to fight everything," which he said was poor guidance from his advisers.
"It's a question of, he needed Mitt Romney to carry Ohio by 8 to beat Sherrod, and whoever was giving him advice really should have been fired because it was bad advice."