Rohrabacher was referencing comments from House Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerTop aide: Obama worried about impeachment for Syria actions An anti-government ideologue like Mulvaney shouldn't run OMB Boehner endorses DeVos for Education secretary MORE (R-Ohio), who said on Tuesday that "this is not a time to back away from Pakistan."
The California congressman on Thursday introduced the second Republican bill that would end U.S. aid to Pakistan. The bill, H.R. 1790, lists in its findings section a series of facts and news stories that point to Pakistan's military and its Inter-Services Intelligence acting "against the interests of the United States by supporting terrorists who kill Americans and in other ways not befitting a recipient of United States aid."
The bill shuts off aid to Pakistan completely, unlike a bill from Rep. Ted PoeTed PoeOvernight Cybersecurity: Lawmakers pushing for vote to delay warrant rule changes Coons to call for voice vote to halt changes to hacking rule The right person for State Department is Rudy Giuliani MORE (R-Texas) that would make aid conditional on a State Department certification that Pakistan had not been harboring bin Laden.
Rohrabacher said he hopes his bill will help keep a discussion going about Pakistan's actions over the last several years, and that this discussion will ultimately lead to a cutting off of aid.
"We've got to make sure the American people understand that we've been providing billions of dollars to Pakistan over the years while they've been committing hostile acts behind our back," he said. "The public may understand that the Pakistanis have been less than honest with us, and they may understand the Pakistanis have done things that are hostile to our national interest … but they may not know that we provide billions of dollars in aid and that we can just cut it off."