His remarks were disclosed in an about-to-be-released new book, Game Change, by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. Once they became public, Reid immediately apologized profusely, but he's not the only offender.
Then-presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenFor medical miracles, empower drug companies — don't vilify them Why the attacks on science in the 21st Century imperils America’s future FCC privacy rules veer off course in eleventh hour MORE's description of Obama as "an African-American who is articulate and bright and clean" would certainly fit the bill. So would the barbs from former President Bill ClintonBill ClintonMemo reveals interplay between Clinton Foundation, personal business The Trail 2016: Comeback in the works? Megyn Kelly is a top priority for Fox — especially after her scuffle with Newt Gingrich MORE during the campaign that caused such an uproar for their suggestions of bigotry.
All reflect the awkwardness with race that afflicts whites from the last generation who witnessed and supported the wrenching transition for blacks from oppression to mainstream inclusion.
By the way, the comparisons between the opinion expressed by Democratic Senate Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidCruz: Precedent exists for keeping Supreme Court short-staffed Warren’s power on the rise Republicans make M investment in Senate races MORE and a line that resulted in the downfall of Republican Leader Trent Lott (Miss.) in 2002 are partisan nonsense.
Let's recall that Lott was bemoaning the fact that Strom Thurmond hadn't been elected president when Thurmond ran in 1948, as an arch-segregationist. Reid was complimenting the African-American who was running for president — in a remarkably clumsy fashion, to be sure. But he didn't seem to be pining for the good old days of American apartheid the way Lott seemed to be.
Still, Reid and all those who took part in the movement, or at least didn't stand in the way, continue to struggle with nuanced stereotypes and misunderstandings that were considered fact just a few decades ago.
Sometimes prejudice is subtle, and deeply ingrained, scattered through the mind during one's formative years. No matter what their history of good will, many still grapple with its remnants.
Today's adult-wannabes didn't witness these battles; they only see the fruits of the victories. They don't give a second thought to living in multicolored surroundings because they grew up in them, unaware of what it took to undo some of the country's sorry oppression.
On the one hand, it's a crying shame they're so oblivious; on the other it's wonderful that diversity is such a given — there are not even memories of anything different.
Score one for those who are growing up unencumbered by the myths of ignorance that infected the last generation. They must hear the ramblings of the Reids, or Bidens, or Clintons, or their own parents, and wonder, "What the hell are they talking about?”
They are talking about those leftovers that still hide in the subconscious and escape every once in a while when even someone of documented good will dredges up an old buried bias and blurts out something stupid.
Not all experience is beneficial. Usually, though, it's better than too little experience. You need a lot of it to know how to separate the good from the bad. But we must never forget there's always more to learn. And unlearn.
Visit Mr. Franken's website at www.bobfranken.tv.