Presumably falling short in its vote count with two weeks left before the August recess begins, the House GOP whip’s office turned to its K Street allies to try to persuade Democrats to vote in favor of CAFTA.
“The Republican leadership will not schedule CAFTA for a floor vote without significant bipartisan support,” Sam Geduldig, Blunt’s liaison to K Street, told the lobbyists in an e-mail sent last Tuesday. It was sent to remind staffers and GOP lawmakers about a meeting organized by Blunt and the House GOP conference to discuss CAFTA.
Geduldig concluded the e-mail with a request to “forward any Member intelligence to [him.]”
Burson Taylor, Blunt’s spokeswoman, said, “Trade votes never pass without Democrats. [Blunt] wants to see the Democrats who run on pro-trade platforms stay pro-trade when it counts.”
The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), the party’s centrist outfit, and its think tank, the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), support CAFTA, but many of the 42 members of the New Democrat Coalition in the House, including its leaders, Reps. Ellen Tauscher (Calif.), Ron KindRon KindHouse Democrat expects support to grow for Pacific trade deal Hatch: TPP deal can get done in lame-duck session Facing the future on trade: Democrats must reject anti-trade obstructionism MORE (Wis.), Artur Davis (Ala.) and Adam SmithAdam SmithSenate poised to override Obama veto Overnight Defense: Debate night is here | Senate sets vote on 9/11 veto override | Kerry, McCain spar over Syria Top Armed Services Dem lobbies against 9/11 bill MORE (Wash.), have said they will oppose CAFTA despite previous support for free-trade agreements.
An aide to a centrist Democrat said Blunt’s effort is too little, too late.
“We wanted to be involved in discussions to talk about labor standards and work provisions,” he said. “Now a week before the vote we’re being asked to support something. This lobbying plan is indicative of the whole process. Don’t include them, and ask for their support.”
He added that his boss was “disappointed that we were not involved in discussions to form policy for a bill that could get broad bipartisan support” on the House floor.