By Michael Shank, analyst, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University - 11/07/07 07:28 PM EST
In the Nov. 6 article “Pakistan’s emergency may mean its aid is cut,” Sens. Carl LevinCarl LevinSenate continues to disrespect Constitution, Obama and Supreme Court by not voting on Garland As other regulators move past implementing Dodd-Frank, the SEC falls further behind Will partisan politics infect the Supreme Court? MORE (D-Mich.) and Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahySanders, liberals press Obama to expand closure of private prisons Police union: Clinton snubbed us Congress saving the past for the future MORE (D-Vt.) are teaching the U.S. Defense and State departments a valuable lesson vis-à-vis the critical importance of a consistent U.S. foreign policy. Contrary to the muted response from Pentagon officials and passive criticism from the secretary of state, the chairmen of the Armed Services and Judiciary committees are threatening to pull aid from Pakistan.
Levin and Leahy realize that in order for the U.S. to be credible in its indictments of Venezuelan media censorship, Iranian intimidation of activists and Egyptian imprisonment of opposition, the U.S. must more assertively chasten Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf for imposing emergency rule, shutting down private media and jailing human rights activists and opposition candidates.
By allowing Pakistan’s president to proceed apace, unfettered by rigorous U.S. opposition that includes an announced withdrawal of military aid, the U.S. starkly undermines its work elsewhere to promote freedom and democracy.
Musharraf has lost nearly all public support. Any efforts now to retain power will be of the dictatorial nature, shown in his recent arrest of 200 personnel from the Human Rights Commission’s office in Lahore, an organization of high repute with which I worked during my time in Pakistan. That the commission is no longer safe to operate freely is an indication of desperate measures by a president in desperate times.
U.S. State and Defense department officials, consequently, must countenance the fact that continued complicity in the Musharraf maelstrom will only undermine, not assist, U.S. foreign policy objectives, whether in Pakistan or elsewhere. Thankfully, Levin and Leahy already realize this.
Impeach him and the votes will follow
From Doug Giebel
Reporting on Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s (D-Ohio) plan to call for impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney, reporter Mike Soraghan notes that the Democratic leadership fears the “I” word will turn off independent voters (“Kucinich plans to force vote on Cheney impeachment,” Nov. 5).
The leadership is wrong. Given the vice president’s unpopularity and the low poll numbers of President Bush, independent voters (along with many Republicans) will welcome impeachment proceedings, if only to pull back the curtain on a controversial administration.
Merely because millions are not marching daily in the streets should not deter the only way to investigate apparent wrongdoing. If impeachment is taken off the table, it means that no matter how egregious the act, this Congress will ignore it to curry favor with a few voters. The public gives Congress a bottom-feeder rating not because it is doing nothing, but because it is not doing what the majority elected it to do: return responsibility and accountability to our government. Impeachment will galvanize a too-complacent nation. The votes will follow.
Big Sandy, Mont.